Jartech, Inc. v. Clancy’s Empirical Analysis
666 F.2d 403 · 1982
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Lieb v. Topstone Industries, Inc. (1986), Roulo v. Russ Berrie & Co. (1989)
37 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 102 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 107 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 116 · 17 U.S.C. § 505 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)
Relies on Miller v. California · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins · Yates v. United States · Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Sony Corp. of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a penalty for the institution of a frivolous or bad faith suit.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.