Worley v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
666 F.2d 417 · 1982
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 424A (§ 224 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Schweiker v. Hansen · Richardson v. Belcher · Haines v. Kerner · United States v. Lazy FC Ranch · Benitez v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not be used to contradict a clear Congressional mandate,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 424a(b), [the SSA] prorated the lump-sum over the years remaining before appellant attained age 62, the statutory limit for imposing the offset.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hodge v. Shalala“the government's wrongful conduct threatened to work a serious injustice and ... the public's interest would not be unduly damaged by the imposition of estoppel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.