Doe v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
666 F.2d 43 · 1981
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 196 W. Va. 208 - State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Caperton (1996), Thomas v. State (1984)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on Cort v. Ash · Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp. · Dickinson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp. · People v. McKenna · State v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`to protect rape victims from degrading and embarrassing disclosure of intimate details about their private lives.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(2) and is constitutionally required to be admitted; or (2) admitted in accordance with subdivision”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of these rules or this Manual, in a case in which a person is accused of a nonconsensual sexual offense, evidence of a victim’s past sexual behavior other than reputation or opinion evidence is also not admissible, unless such evidence other than reputation or opinion evidence is— (1) admitted in accordance with subdivisions (c)(1) and (c)(2) and is constitutionally required to be admitted; or (2) admitted in accordance with subdivision (e) and is evidence of— (A) past sexual behavior with persons other than the accused, offered by the accused upon the issue of whether the accused was or was not, with respect to the alleged victim, the source of semen or injury; or (B) past sexual behavior with the accused and is offered by the accused upon the issue of whether the alleged victim consented to the sexual behavior with respect to which the nonconsensual sexual offense is alleged. (c)(1) If the person accused of committing a nonconsensual sexual offense intends to offer under subdivision (b) evidence of specific instances of the alleged victim’s past sexual behavior, the accused shall serve notice thereof on the military judge and the trial counsel. (2) The notice described in paragraph (1) shall be accompanied by an offer of proof. If the military judge determines that the offer of proof contains evidence described in subdivision (b), the military judge shall conduct a hearing, which may be closed, to determine if such evidence is admissi”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.