United States v. Barham’s Empirical Analysis
666 F.2d 521 · 1982
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Reed (1985), 598 So. 2d 895 - Ex Parte Jackson (1992)
17 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Dames & Moore v. Regan · Wood v. Strickland · Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Smith · United States v. Brown · United States v. Stephens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' "[C]laims of inadequate representation cannot be determined on direct appeal where such claims were not raised before the . . . [trial] court and there has been no opportunity to develop and include in the record evidence bearing on the merits of the allegation.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If any person by corrupt means or by threats or force endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any ... witness ... of any court of this State in the discharge of his duty, or by corrupt means or by threats or force obstructs, impedes, or endeavors to obstruct or impede the due administration of justice therein, he is liable to be prosecuted, and on conviction to be punished by fine not exceeding $10,000.00 or by imprisonment not exceeding three years, or both, ____ (emphasis added) Md.Code Ann. art. 27 § 27 (1957, 1982 Repl.Vol.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'venue ... is to be determined by focusing on which court is affected by the attempt to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice. It is the impact of the acts, not their location, that controls.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.