Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 F.2d 582 - Wiesner v. Weigert

Wiesner v. Weigert’s Empirical Analysis

666 F.2d 582 · 1981

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
October 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2007

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

90198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp. · Joshua C. Conner v. George G. Joris · Reese v. Hurst · In re Fielder · Landon v. Ginzton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an invention is not reduced to practice until its practice or utility is demonstrated pursuant to its intended use.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the embodiments tested ... were not considered successful for their intended purpose and therefore had no recognized utility”). 8 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.