Johnson v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
666 F.2d 842 · 1981
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cuyler v. Adams · United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, Superintendent · 508 F. Supp. 52 - Johnson v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Because the IAD has been held to constitute a law of the United States, ... the federal courts have habeas corpus jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , over the IAD violation asserted here.” Johnson v. Williams, 666 F.2d at 844 n. 1 (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.