Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 F.3d 325 - Juarez v. Aguilar

Juarez v. Aguilar’s Empirical Analysis

666 F.3d 325 · 2011

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where factual disputes exist in an interlocutory appeal asserting qualified immunity, we accept the plaintiff's version of the facts as true.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only to the extent that [the denial of qualified immunity] turns on an issue of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “review the materiality of any factual disputes, but not their genuineness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.