Schreiber v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Smith v. Doe · Beazell v. State of Ohio Chatfield · De Veau v. Braisted · Jones v. Murray · 122 Wash. 2d 73 - State v. Olivas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime after its commission.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[WJhile the petitioners allude to equal protection in one sentence in their appellate brief, they do not present an argument on the issue, and it could be deemed waived.”); Soo Line R.R. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 521 N.W.2d 685, 691 (Iowa 1994) (stating”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duder v. Shanks“`forbid the application of a new punitive measure to conduct already committed,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.