McNair v. Haywardd’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2013
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Tollett v. Henderson · Crist v. Bretz · Menna v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D Jue process requires that an accused be given sufficiently precise notification of the date of the alleged crime that he can prepare his defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“for the obvious reason that an application of the normal rule of finality, under which the losing party must wait until after the trial to challenge, intermediate rulings, would foree the defendant to suffer the prejudice the double jeopardy clause seeks to prevent before he would have an appellate forum to hear his claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris“'Where the defendant has complained of errors that vitiate the prior proceedings and judgment and they are nullified at his request, he cannot then take the inconsistent position that there was a valid proceeding and judgment against him which constitute a former jeopardy.!”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lafferty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.