Trainer v. Broome’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2018
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 464 So. 2d 552 - Vetrick v. Hollander · 492 So. 2d 772 - Walker v. State · 573 So. 2d 196 - Vallieres v. Grossman · Perkins v. State · 443 So. 2d 471 - State v. Dukes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if evidence exists disclosing that an individual was booked into custody for a specific offense, one must presume that the individual was in fact arrested for that offense. Thus, the act of booking or placing a person into custody for an offense clearly implies that an arrest has occurred. Id. (citation omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the act of booking or placing a person into custody for an offense clearly implies that an arrest has occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.