Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 So. 2d 1045 - Patsy v. Patsy

666 So. 2d 1045 - Patsy v. Patsy’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2018

17 state decisions

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · State v. Simpson · 508 So. 2d 340 - Muckenfuss v. Deltona Corporation · Brignoli v. Balch Hardy & Scheinman, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “complete absence of a justiciable issue of either law or fact.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In a modification proceeding in which he represented the former husband, Meisler filed a motion to disqualify opposing counsel on the ground that he had perpetrated a fraud on the court on two prior occasions. At Meisler's request, based on the motion, the court stayed further proceedings until after it conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to disqualify. After hearing the evidence the trial court found that the motion had no factual basis, was filed solely to delay the proceedings, and was a sham. The court assessed attorney's fees of $1,870 and costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A court must, of course, exercise caution in invoking its inherent power, and it must comply with the mandates of due process, both in determining that the requisite bad faith exists and in assessing fees....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.