666 So. 2d 1070 - State v. Vale’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably State v. Marcantel (2002), State v. Garcia (2012)
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 627 So. 2d 1373 - State v. Code · 381 So. 2d 819 - State v. Brady · 475 So. 2d 752 - State v. Nash · 650 So. 2d 379 - State v. Vale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hope or knowledge that he will receive leniency from the state is highly relevant to establish his bias or interest.”
19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The correct inquiry is whether the reviewing court, assuming that the damaging potential of the cross-examination were fully realized, is nonetheless convinced that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Factors to be considered by the reviewing court include the importance of the witness' testimony in the prosecution's case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, the extent of cross-examination otherwise permitted, and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cayton“In return for Bergeron's testimony against relators, the state agreed to and did dismiss the charge against him in January of 1991.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.