Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 SO2D 209 - Lee v. State

Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2014

9 state decisions

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 598 So. 2d 71 - City of Holmes Beach v. Grace · 586 So. 2d 488 - Bashlor v. State · 660 So. 2d 385 - Warrington v. State · Silva v. State · Helton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The flaw in Mr. Lee's argument is his failure to appeal the August 1993 sentence when it was initially imposed. If he had done so, we would have reversed the sentence and remanded for resentencing. At that resentencing, however, he could have received 17 years in prison rather than community control. By accepting the benefit of community control, he waived his right to enforce the earlier true split sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.