Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 SO2D 224 - Bullock v. Jones

Bullock v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2012

3 state decisions

10199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 411 So. 2d 354 - Hudgens v. Hudgens · Winters v. Katseralis · 583 So. 2d 1078 - Greeley v. Greeley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he fact that the former wife lost on an issue, which is not spurious, does not mean that she could not be a candidate to receive attorney's fees from the former husband”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.