In re Thomson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 537 So. 2d 1331 - Tricon Metals & Services, Inc. v. Topp · Simpson v. State · 587 So. 2d 908 - Bean v. Broussard · 638 So. 2d 1305 - Roussel v. Hutton · 222 So. 2d 820 - Morgan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court considers penalties and sanctions against attorneys. Our authority and jurisdiction to assess penalties or impose sanctions against attorneys arises from varied sources, embracing specific rules as well as broad declarations. Illustrative, and not by way of limitation, of the specific rules pronouncing this Court’s authority to assess penalties or sanction attorneys, are Miss. Sup.Ct. R. 1, 2, 28, 34, 36, 38, and 46, as well as Miss.Code Ann. § 73-3-301 (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Humphrey v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.