Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2013
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · Peterson v. State · 608 So. 2d 314 - Butler v. State · 547 So. 2d 29 - Blanks v. State · 472 So. 2d 398 - Tobias v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Reversal is proper only where such discretion has been abused and a substantial right of a party has been affected.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dahl v. State · McGowan v. State“[w]here an accused, on direct examination, seeks to exculpate himself, such testimony is subject to normal impeachment via cross-examination, and this is so though it would bring out that the accused may have committed another crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the evidence used by the State in response is more like rebuttal evidence than impeachment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.