¶1After a careful review of the record, we find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion regarding the admissibility of evidence. Jent v. State, 408 So.2d 1024, 1029 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 2916, 73 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1982). Additionally, if there was any error in the admission of this evidence, that error was harmless in light of the solid eyewitness identification of the defendant. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).
¶2Affirmed.