Roland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 684 So. 2d 608 - Conner v. State (1996), 783 So. 2d 711 - Reeder v. State (2001)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blackledge v. Allison · In Re Michael Sindram · Sellers v. Sanders · Myers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not reflect that [the petitioner] was advised concerning the rights of which he allegedly claims ignorance.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Myers v. State · Harris v. State“[s]olemn declarations in open court [by a defendant] carry a strong presumption of verity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A prisoner who has filed a proper motion pursuant to this Act, and whose motion has withstood summary dismissal under § 99-39-11(2), may be entitled to trial transcripts or other relevant documents under the discovery provisions of § 99-39-15, upon good cause shown and in the discretion of the trial judge. If the prisoner's request for transcripts or other documents is denied, and his overall petition is ultimately denied, then he may appeal the denial of his petition for collateral relief pursuant to § 99-39-25 which provides that final judgments entered under the Act may be reviewed by [the supreme court] on appeal brought by either the State or the prisoner. Within that appeal, the prisoner may include the claim that the denial of his request for transcripts or other documents was error....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.