Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 So. 2d 754 - Petti v. State

666 So. 2d 754 - Petti v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 737 So. 2d 275 - Edwards v. State (1999), 790 So. 2d 773 - Conley v. State (2001)

28 state decisions

170199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a man of average caution [would believe] that a crime has been committed and that a particular individual committed it.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “held on numerous occasions that it is only in cases consisting entirely of circumstantial evidence that an instruction must be given which requires the jury to resolve, in favor of the accused, doubt over circumstances susceptible of two interpretations .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “of persons supply hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of a reviewing court is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.