Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2013
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 9221 Associates v. Industrial State Bank · Holm v. United States · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Dill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person commits the crime of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[m]atters not objected to at trial and not ruled upon by the trial judge will not be considered for the first time on appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the jury is entitled at all times to have access to the trial court for such additional instructions as they may require.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.