Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 SO2D 960 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 974 So. 2d 359 - Khianthalat v. State (2008), Welsh v. State (2003)

29 state decisions

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones · Brown v. State · Grant v. State · In re Trial Courts of the Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases · 498 So. 2d 929 - State v. Wimberly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the indictment or information must allege all the statutory elements of the permissive lesser included offense; and (2) there must be some evidence adduced at trial establishing all of these elements.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the knowing and unlawful obtaining or use, or the knowing and unlawful endeavor to obtain or use, (2) the motor vehicle of another, (3) with intent to either temporarily or permanently (a) deprive the owner or lawful possessor of the motor vehicle of a right to the vehicle or a benefit from it, or (b) appropriate the motor vehicle to the accused's own use or to the use of any person not entitled to it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “On an indictment or information on which the defendant is to be tried for any offense the jury may convict the defendant of: (a) an attempt to commit the offense if such attempt is an offense and is supported by the evidence. The judge shall not instruct the jury if there is no evidence to support the attempt and the only evidence proves a completed offense; or (b) any offense that as a matter of law is a necessarily included offense or a lesser included offense of the offense charged in the indictment or information and is supported by the evidence. The judge shall not instruct on any lesser included offense as to which there is no evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.