Henrich v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Freeman v. Freeman · Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Cross · Rattikin Title Co. v. Grievance Committee of State Bar of Texas · State Ex Rel. Chandler v. Dancer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because one of the Rules of the Supreme Court, see Art. XII, Section 8, Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 7-104, that was enacted in 1973, was violated by the District Attorney when his investigator took a confession from appellant, did this violation cause Art. 38.23, V.A.C. C.P. to become applicable to this cause, thus causing appellant's confession to become inadmissible evidence at his trial? This question should be answered in the affirmative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pannell v. State“(A) During the course of his representation of a client a lawyer shall not:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pannell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.