Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 666 SW2D 632 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Earnhart v. State · Gleason v. Davis · Gleason v. Davis · Young v. State · Sales v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “means: 14 (A) to alter, make, complete, execute, or authenticate any writing so that it purports: 15 (i) to be the act of another who did not authorize that act.... 16 (emphasis added). Charter Bank argues that the certificates represented an act by Ranchlander--the receipt of a deposit and a promise to pay by the bank--and that when Moon issued $100,000 certificates on deposits of $1,000, she made a writing that purported”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.