Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 667 A2D 43 - Grosso v. Love

Grosso v. Love’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Klusman v. Bucks County Court of Common Pleas · Johnson v. COM., PA. BD. OF PROB. & PAR. · Makopoulos v. Walt Disney World, Inc. · 128 Pa. Commw. 499 - Mann v. City of Philadelphia · 378 Pa. Super. 142 - Button v. Button

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(j) If, simultaneous with the commencement of an action or proceeding or the taking of an appeal, a party has filed a petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court prior to acting upon the petition may dismiss the action, proceeding or appeal if the allegation of poverty is untrue or if it is satisfied that the action, proceeding or appeal is frivolous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.