Compensation Department of District Five v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
667 F.2d 336 · 1981
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission (1984), National Mining Association v. Department of Labor
25 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McKart v. United States · Leedom v. Kyne · Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co. · General Public Utilities Corporation v. Susquehanna Valley Alliance · South Dakota v. Nebraska
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there exists a special statutory review procedure, it is ordinarily supposed that Congress intended that procedure to be the exclusive means of obtaining judicial review in those cases to which it applies.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the scheme of review established by Congress for determinations of black lung disability benefits was intended to be exclusive.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In a case of actual controversy as to the validity of any order under Section 5403 of ... [the Act, which addresses the establishment, amendment or revocation of the construction and safety standards], any person who may be adversely affected by such order when it is effective may at any time prior to the sixtieth day after such order is issued file a petition with the United States court of appeals for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business, for judicial review of such order [in accordance with the provisions of sections 701 through 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act (the “APA”)].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.