Brink v. M E Brink F’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently February 2013 · most notably Reich v. Lancaster (1995), Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. Huttinger (1990)
2 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonald · Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co. · Nedd v. United Mine Workers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a beneficiary or one suing on his behalf can maintain a suit against the trustee to enforce the trust or to enjoin or obtain redress for a breach of trust.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith“the timeliness requirement of Rule 24 should not be as strictly enforced as in a case where intervention is only permissive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robert Scardelletti
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.