Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 667 F.2d 783 - United States v. Daniel

United States v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

667 F.2d 783 · 1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2006 · most notably Forsyth v. Barr (1994), United States v. Chavez-Vernaza (1987)

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

170198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Joseph Skilken & Co. v. City of Toledo · Geders v. United States · United States v. Zemek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is clear from our precedents that evidence obtained by federal officials, or by federal officials acting in concert with state officers, in violation of state law but in compliance with federal law is admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “designed to protect the public from unnecessarily widespread dissemination of the contents of interceptions and from the wholesale use of [such] information ... by an officer ... for personal or illegal purposes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “appropriate to the proper performance of the [officer's] official duties”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.