Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

667 F. App'x 428

United States v. Lightner

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2016

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2016-08-01

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582

Decided 2016-08-01

¶1Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶2David Fitzgerald Lightner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lightner, No. 3:93-cr-00133-FDW-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3AFFIRMED

/667/fappx/428 · .json · Public domain