667 F. Supp. 2d 138 - Haley v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
13 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Land US v. Dollar · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt · Emmett J. Stebbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Iinsurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance Company · Darby v. U.S. Department of Energy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[1] any judicial district in the State in which the unlawful employment practice is alleged to have been committed, [2] in the judicial district in which the employment records relevant to such practice are maintained and administered, or [3] in the judicial district in which the aggrieved person would have worked but for the alleged unlawful employment practice, [4] but if the respondent is not found within any such district, such an action may be brought within the judicial district in which the respondent has his principal office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.