667 F. Supp. 2d 175 - Bourguignon v. MacDonald’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
10 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Zadvydas v. Davis · Clark Field Office Director Seattle Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al. v. Martinez · Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense v. Padilla et al. · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.