Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

667 N.W.2d 911

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 2003

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 2003-08-21

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2015

9 state decisions

Relies on The Marckel Co. v. Zitzow

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice

¶1(concurring in part, dissenting in part).

¶2I join in part with Justice Gilbert’s dissent and conclude that the trial court — a *927judicial officer — was a de facto court when, under longstanding practice and the color of legislative authority, he presided ably and without objection over the trial of Harris. I would affirm the judgment of the trial court as valid and binding under Marckel Co. v. Zitzow, 218 Minn. 305, 15 N.W.2d 777 (1944). When, as in Marckel, the order and judgment of a municipal court are valid and binding even when operating under a statute later declared unconstitutional, so also the judgment of a judicial officer is valid and binding when he operates under long-accepted practice and longstanding statutory authority, now declared unconstitutional. Marckel, 218 Minn. at 310-11, 15 N.W.2d at 780.

/667/nw2d/911 · .json · Public domain