Zartman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Boyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find it unnecessary in this case to decide whether to follow the majority of courts which reject the doctrine of `implied bias' based only on prior jury service in similar cases with similar witnesses, or the minority of courts which adopt that doctrine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The trial court denied the challenges for cause, reasoning that the overwhelming majority of courts had refused to imply bias from prior jury service on similar cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.