State v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Pierre · State v. Sorensen · State v. Salmon · State v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where evidence is excluded by the trial court and the substance of such evidence is later admitted through some other means, any error which may have resulted is cured.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the substance of such [evidence] was later received through another source.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“need not determine whether the proffered {evidence]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.