Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 667 So. 2d 1213 - Pendergrass v. Pendergrass

667 So. 2d 1213 - Pendergrass v. Pendergrass’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 492 So. 2d 1193 - Bergeron v. Bergeron · State v. Gamberella · 632 So. 2d 307 - Zatzkis v. Zatzkis · Zatzkis v. Zatzkis · State ex rel. Tucker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “|/‘Income” means: [[Image here]] (c) The court may also consider as income the benefits a party derives from expense-sharing or other sources; however, in determining the benefits of expense-sharing, the court shall not consider the income of another spouse, regardless of the legal regime under which the remarriage exists, except to the extent that such income is used directly to reduce the cost of a party’s actual expenses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[u]nder these circumstances, basing the income calculation on an average of twelve months more accurately reflects the realities of [the] situation, and is the more equitable approach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.