Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 667 So. 2d 253 - Lee v. State

667 So. 2d 253 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Callaway · Davis v. State · 405 So. 2d 436 - Williams v. State · 438 So. 2d 178 - McNeil v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT'S FAILURE TO CONSIDER A DEFENDANT FOR CLASSIFICATION AS A YOUTHFUL OFFENDER IS COGNIZABLE UNDER RULE 3.800(a), FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The following criteria shall be considered in determining whether to classify as a youthful offender a person who meets the requirements of subsection (1)....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.