Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 667 SO2D 337 - Dillingham v. Dillingham

Dillingham v. Dillingham’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 621 So. 2d 417 - Mize v. Mize · Gligorijevic v. Gligorijevic · Canterbury v. State · 573 So. 2d 182 - Rusher v. Rice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court erred in restricting the former wife's ability to relocate, because the issue of relocation was not raised by the pleadings nor litigated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.