667 So. 2d 874 - Burdo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State · 659 So. 2d 1082 - The Florida Bar v. Burkich-Burrell · 635 So. 2d 1032 - Sutton v. State · 666 So. 2d 140 - Kordon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. · 645 So. 2d 1 - Tomlinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that where a sentence is reversed because the trial court failed to orally pronounce certain special conditions of probation which later appeared in the written sentence, the court must strike the unannounced conditions and cannot reimpose them upon resentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.