667 So. 2d 894 - Ding v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 223 So. 2d 713 - Shingleton v. Bussey · 314 So. 2d 765 - Martin v. United Security Services, Inc. · 503 So. 2d 1237 - Allie v. Ionata · Robinson v. Springfield Co. · Thomas v. Martin Ex Rel. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is also clear that the purpose of this provision in the current version of the Wrongful Death Act enacted in 1972, was to eliminate the multiplicity of suits that resulted from each survivor bringing an independent action under the predecessor act.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“At the outset, we recognize that under substantive law the decedent's survivors are the real parties in interest. Nonetheless, the Legislature has mandated that a decedent's personal representative is the party `who shall recover for the benefit of the decedent's survivors and estate all damages ....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even though a wrongful death action must be brought by the personal representative of the estate as a nominal party on behalf of the surviving spouse, the real party in interest is the surviving spouse.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.