Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 A2D 810 - Bulin v. Stein

Bulin v. Stein’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2010

1 district · 15 state decisions

80199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk · Grammenos v. C. M. Lemos · Stanga v. McCormick Shipping Corp. · Novak v. World Bank · Umbenhauer v. Woog

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Time limit for service. Within 60 days of the filing of the complaint ... the plaintiff must file either an acknowledgment of service or proof of service of the summons, the complaint and any order directed by the Court to the parties at the time of filing. The acknowledgment or proof shall be filed as to each defendant who has not responded to the complaint. Prior to the expiration of the foregoing time period, a motion may be made to extend the time for service. The motion must set forth in detail the efforts which have been made, and will be made in the future, to obtain service. The Court shall extend the period for such time as may be warranted by circumstances set forth in the motion. Failure to comply with the requirements of this Rule shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of the complaint.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall not take effect until fourteen (14) days after the date on which it is docketed, and shall be vacated upon the granting of a motion filed by plaintiff within such 14 day period showing good cause why the case should not be dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.