Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 F.2d 1140 - Ormsbee Development Co. v. Grace

Ormsbee Development Co. v. Grace’s Empirical Analysis

668 F.2d 1140 · 1982

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
9
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 12 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Smiga v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (1985), Foster v. Turley (1986)

31 federal appellate · 12 district · 15 state decisions

26019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Rideout v. United States · Santoni v. United States · Lehman Brothers v. Schein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitration awards generally need not delineate reasons or reasoning”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Once it has been established that the parties had entered into a binding agreement to arbitrate, the entire controversy, including the validity (and essence) of the disputed contract must be referred to arbitration. Parties who agree to submit matters to arbitration are presumed to agree that everything, both as to law and fact, necessary to render an ultimate decision is included in the authority of the arbitrators.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is only clear evidence of impropriety which justifies the denial of summary confirmation of an arbitration award. For an award to be set aside, the evidence of bias or interest of an arbitrator must be direct, definite and capable of demonstration rather than remote, uncertain, or speculative.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.