Rhoades v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
668 F.2d 1213 · 1982
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2005
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 857 · 10 U.S.C. § 918 · 10 U.S.C. § 919
Relies on Bell v. United States · Dickenson v. United States · Moses v. United States · Cowden v. United States · Cowden v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When an executed court-martial sentence which includes a forfeiture is set aside or disapproved, and a new trial or rehearing is ordered which results in an approved sentence to forfeiture, credit the member with the amount of any forfeiture effected under the first sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Keys v. Cole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.