Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 F.2d 201 - Smithkline Corporation v. Staats

Smithkline Corporation v. Staats’s Empirical Analysis

668 F.2d 201 · 1981

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
May 1983
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · United States v. National Bank · Kokoszka v. Belford · Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “manufacturing costs (including raw and packaging materials, labor and fringe benefits, quality control and supervision), manufacturing overhead (including plant administration, production planning, warehousing, utilities and security), royalty expenses, and delivery costs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The major purposes of this bill are twofold: One, to give the Comptroller General the proper tools to do the job the Congress has instructed him to do; and, two, to provide a deterrent to improprieties and wastefulness in the negotiation of contracts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the contractor was charging to the [cost-plus] contract expenses which should have been charged to the fixed-price contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.