Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 F.2d 32 - United States v. Cordero

United States v. Cordero’s Empirical Analysis

668 F.2d 32 · 1981

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
3
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

73 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. David (1991), United States v. McLernon (1984)

73 federal appellate · 9 district · 3 state decisions

43019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3163 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3164 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952 · 21 U.S.C. § 963

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Nixon · Gerstein v. Pugh · Stone v. Powell · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]othing in the treaty prevents a sovereign nation from deporting foreign nationals for other reasons and in other ways should it wish to do so.... To hold that extradition treaties forbid foreign nations to return criminal defendants except in accordance with the formal procedures they contain, would insofar as we are aware, represent a novel interpretation of those treaties. Under such an interpretation, extradition treaties would hinder rather than help serve, the return of those accused of crimes within American jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Speedy Trial Act specifically provides that when a defendant pleads guilty but later withdraws that plea 'the defendant shall be deemed indicted ... on the day the order permitting withdrawal of the plea becomes final.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “since[venue] is not an element of the offense, the government will not necessarily seek to prove the necessary connection unless the defense warns the government that the matter is at issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.