Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 F.2d 421 - Olson v. Green

Olson v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

668 F.2d 421 · 1982

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
9
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc. (1987), United States v. DeLuca (1982)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

190198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Harrington v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"statement is admissible only if it bears adequate `indicia of reliability.' Reliability can be inferred without more in a case where the evidence falls within a firmly rooted hearsay exception. In other cases, the evidence must be excluded, at least absent a showing of particularized guarantees of trustworthiness."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`a strong incentive to speak, whether it be truthfully or falsely * * * does not indicate sufficient reliability to bring the statement within the [penal interest] exception to the hearsay rule.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “acted on [the defendant's] behalf or that they acted together.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.