Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 F.2d 985 - Donovan v. Shaw

Donovan v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

668 F.2d 985 · 1982

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Wheeler v. Hurdman (1987), Dubbs ex rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc. (2003)

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

1101982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Powell · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co · Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation · Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins · Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that a subpoena enforcement proceeding is not the proper forum in which to litigate the question of [FLSA] coverage.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the investigation is authorized by Congress, is for a purpose Congress can order, and the documents sought are relevant to the inquiry.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The material sought by the subpoena was not plainly irrelevant to lawful purposes of the [agency] and it was the duty of the district court to order its production.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.