United States v. Mare’s Empirical Analysis
668 F.3d 35 · 2012
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 844
Relies on United States v. Gardiner · United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De Jesus · United States of America v. George Varoudakis · United States v. Fields · United States v. Villarman-Oviedo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he balancing act that the rule demands 'is a quintessentially fact-sensitive enterprise, and the trial judge is in the best position to make such fact[-]bound assessments.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“from the vista of a cold - 23 - appellate record, [to] reverse a district court's on-the-spot judgment concerning the relative weighing of probative value and unfair effect”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“intrinsic evidence that would satisfy the charged crime’s specific intent element is not governed by Rule 404(b)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.