Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

668 F.3d 776

Docket No. 09-31215.

United States v. Wright

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 25, 2012.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2012-01-25

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2012

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 2012-01-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Brian Marshall Klebba, Diane Hollenshead Copes (argued), James R. Mann, Asst. U.S. Attys., New Orleans, LA, Michael A. Rotker, Crim. Div., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶2Robin Elise Schulberg (argued), Roma Ajubita Kent, Asst. Fed. Pub. Defenders, Fed. Pub. Defender’s Office, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

¶3Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.1

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

/668/f3d/776 · .json · Public domain