¶1 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶2 Jerry A. Hurst appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his complaint in which he sought to raise claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2722, 2724 (2012), and various state laws. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurst v. Harbert, No. 5:15-cv-00033-GEC (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 12, 2016; entered Feb. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶3 AFFIRMED