Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 668 N.W.2d 32 - State v. Kramer

State v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · California v. Trombetta · Patterson v. New York · State v. Webb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, we do not address issues not raised below[, but b]ecause we cannot address [defendant's] challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence without first addressing the burden shouldered by each party, we must, for the purposes of our analysis, reach the merits of this argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.