Trobaugh v. Sondag’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
6
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Krahn v. Kinney · 25 Cal. 4th 1194 - Coscia v. McKenna & Cuneo · Bailey v. Tucker · 747 So. 2d 931 - Steele v. Kehoe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to dismiss is properly granted `only when there exists no conceivable set of facts entitling the non-moving party to relief.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“equitable principles against shifting responsibility for the consequences of the criminal's action; the paradoxical difficulties of awarding damages to a guilty person; theoretical and practical difficulties of proving causation; the potential undermining of the postconviction process if a legal malpractice action overrules the judgments entered in the postconviction proceedings; preserving judicial economy by avoiding relitigation of settled matters; creation of a bright line rule determining when the statute of limitations runs on the malpractice action; availability of alternative postconviction remedies; and the chilling effect on thorough defense lawyering.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“principles of judicial economy and comity, including the avoidance of multiple proceedings related to the same factual and procedural issues, respect for other . . . processes such as post-conviction relief, and the prevention of potentially wasteful practices such as requiring a plaintiff to file a malpractice claim which may never come to fruition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.